Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Pet owners in India have support of the Government - latest circular regarding pet ownership

Amazing the way the Indian Government is so open on pet ownership. So much that we, in the US can emulate.

The Animal Welfare Board of India have issued a revised circular with regards to the welfare of Pet Dogs and Street Dogs in different residential localities.
The same was revised after the Animal Welfare Board of India received a lot of queries with regards to the unreasonable restrictions that many Resident Welfare Associations (RWA), Apartment Owner’s Association (AOA), Cooperative Housing Societies and other residential condominiums have adopted against owners or families that have pets. Some of these associations and societies have put up notices that prohibit the use of public areas, such as parks and elevators for dogs. Many have even banned owners from keeping pets altogether. There have also been complaints raised by many concerned people about the mistreatment and dislocation of street dogs in the surrounding areas. Many compassionate people who feed and look after the stray dogs are discouraged and pressurised to refrain from the same. Animal lovers have raised a widespread resentment to the unreasonable and irrational steps taken by RWA’s. The current circular is in lieu of the court rulings against the ill treatment of pets and street dogs in a residential community.
Appended herewith are the key points that have been a part of the circular with respect to residents who own pets:
  • No RWA can legally introduce any sort of ban on keeping of pet dogs by residents. 
  • RWAs cannot insist that only small size dogs are acceptable and larger breeds are not.
  • Dog barking cannot be cited as a valid or compelling reason for introducing any ban.
  • Residents have the legal and fundamental right to choose the life that they wish to live, which includes such facets as living with or without companion animals and no ban can be put on the same. 
  • Unless the pet owning residents are not violating any municipal laws, no objection can be laid down.
  • With respect to use of elevators / lifts:
    1. There are no court rulings that disallow pets from using the elevators, especially in multi story residential apartments and hence no charges can be imposed on residents who own pets.
    2. RWAs have to ensure that no restriction is imposed - neither a ban nor any special charges - for the use of lifts by pets.
  • With respect to use of Parks / Gardens by pets
  1. RWAs cannot ban pets from gardens or parks.
  2. In case the park / garden is a common area which residents also use, a particular time may be fixed when pets can be walked in the park / garden without any inconvenience to other residents.
  • With respect to use of leashes or muzzles
  1. Pet owners can be requested to walk their pets on leash especially when walking them in common areas.
  2. The use of muzzles cannot be insisted upon the pet owners.
  • With respect to defecation of pets in community premises
  1. Pet owners can be requested to clean up after their pets in case the pets ease themselves in community premises.
  2. No rule / regulation / by - laws / special charges / fines can be imposed for the mandatory cleaning of the same.
  3. RWAs may experiment with the creation of several pet defecation areas within the community premises and pet owners can be requested to train their pets to use the same.
  4. No special charges / fines can be imposed on any pet owner, as there is no mandate in the law for the same.
  • With respect to intimidation
  1. If any association succeeds in intimidating a pet owner to “give up” or “abandon” their pet, it will actually have abetted violation of law.
Following are the key points in the circular with regards to the treatment of street dogs:
  • No street dog can be beaten or driven away or killed from the neighbourhood.
  • Animal birth control measures and vaccinations may be undertaken but the dogs will have to be released back into the same locality or territory after sterilisation and immunity
  • The same will be done as dogs are territorial in nature. They tend to fight off other dogs and keep them from entering into their territories hence stabilising the dog population within each locality.
  • There is no law that prohibits the feeding of street animals
  • Animal cruelty is an offense under Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Sections 428 / 429 of the Indian Penal Code. The same is punishable with imprisonment and fine.
  • Attempts to interfere with or harass people who choose to tend to and feed community dogs, may lead to  a grave offense of criminal intimidation.
  • Any aggression or hostility that the dogs may be subjected to, will only render them aggressive or hostile towards the humans. 
The AWBI circular can be read here.

Friday, June 29, 2012

Texas Animal-Related Laws

Texas Penal Code Chapter 42

§ 42.09. Cruelty to Animals

A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly:
  1. tortures an animal;
  2. fails unreasonably to provide necessary food, care, or shelter for an animal in the person's custody;
  3. abandons unreasonably an animal in the person's custody;
  4. transports or confines an animal in a cruel manner;
  5. kills, seriously injures, or administers poison to an animal, other than cattle, horses, sheep, swine, or goats, belonging to another without legal authority or the owner's effective consent;
  6. causes one animal to fight with another;
  7. uses a live animal as a lure in dog race training or in dog coursing on a racetrack;
  8. trips a horse;
  9. injures an animal, other than cattle, horses, sheep, swine, or goats, belonging to another without legal authority or the owner's effective consent; or
  10. seriously overworks an animal.
An offense under Subsection (a)(2), (3), (4), (9), or (10) is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a state jail felony if the person has previously been convicted two times under this section.
An offense under Subsection (a)(1), (5), (6), (7), or (8) is a state jail felony, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if the person has previously been convicted two times under this section.

§ 42.091. Attack on an Assistance Animal

a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly attacks, injures, or kills an assistance animal.
b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly incites or permits an animal owned by or otherwise in the custody of the actor to attack, injure, or kill an assistance animal and, as a result of the person's conduct, the assistance animal is attacked, injured, or killed.

§ 42.10. Dog Fighting

A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:
  1. causes a dog to fight with another dog;
  2. for a pecuniary benefit causes a dog to fight with another dog;
  3. participates in the earnings of or operates a facility used for dog fighting;
  4. uses or permits another to use any real estate, building, room, tent, arena, or other property for dog fighting;
  5. owns or trains a dog with the intent that the dog be used in an exhibition of dog fighting; or attends as a spectator an exhibition of dog fighting.

Cruelty Complaints

Regarding Dogs, Cats, Horses and All Other Animals
Houston Area:
Houston SPCA - 713-869-7722 - Ask for Cruelty Investigations
Houston Humane Society - 713-433-6421 x 396 - Ask for Cruelty Investigations

Ban on Roadside Animal Sales

Violators Face $500 Fine For Each Violation
The ban makes it illegal to sell any type of animal on public property or public
rights-of-way in unincorporated Harris County, including shopping center parking
lots. Violators could be charged with a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by as
much as a $500 fine.
REPORT VIOLATORS to local police !!!! Call (281) 999-3191 to report violators!
Sec. 6-118. Roadside and flea market sales.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, trade, barter, lease, rent, give away, or display for a commercial purpose a live animal on a roadside, public right-of-way, commercial parking lot, or at an outdoor special sale, swap meet, flea market, parking lot sale, or similar event.
(b) This section does not apply to:
(1) An agent of a business that has a certificate of occupancy from the building inspection division authorizing the occupancy of the premises for purposes of operating a business selling pets;
(2) Reserved.
(3) An event primarily for the sale of agricultural livestock such as hoofed animals or animals or fowl commonly raised for food, dairy, or fiber products; or
(4) A tax-exempt non-profit organization founded for the purpose of providing humane sanctuary or shelter for abandoned or unwanted animals.
(Ord. No. 07-148, § 11, 1-31-07)